Moritz Muehlenhoff <j...@debian.org> writes: > Source: geda-gaf > Version: 1:1.8.2-11 > Severity: serious > > Your package came up as a candidate for removal from Debian:
For the record, I've previously indicated that I consider lepton-eda a complete replacement for geda-gaf in Debian. It was forked some years ago, is actively maintained, and still reads existing geda-gaf designs and library files perfectly. I contribute to lepton-eda upstream, and actively maintain the lepton-eda package in Debian. I do wonder if there's some action we can/should take when removing geda-gaf to ease the transition for existing users of the package to lepton-eda? Perhaps replace the package content with dependency information causing the replacement to be more or less automatic on upgrades? [shrug] Bdale
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
