Hi Andreas, I can at least identify which .woff files correspond to which fonts, that is possible with grep. Here's the output: https://gist.github.com/eebrown/95615fc35af364bd0fae09a69273dbdf
I think deleting the .woff files and seeing if the fonts render properly when they are installed at the system level is reasonable but I too am not sure exactly how to try out all the fonts. If that doesn't work, I guess it would be a matter of symlinking files to replace the .woff files. This might require a step to derive the .woff wiles in the format expected by bslib. On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 9:44 AM Andreas Tille <andr...@fam-tille.de> wrote: > > Hi Eric, > > Am Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 06:42:59AM -0400 schrieb Eric Brown: > > To update, I found that a few more are packaged in texlive-fonts-extra ( > > https://packages.debian.org/buster/texlive-fonts-extra) > > > > Roboto https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/fonts-roboto > > Ubuntu https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/fonts-ubuntu > > Open Sans https://packages.debian.org/sid/fonts-open-sans > > Lato https://packages.debian.org/sid/fonts-lato > > Cabin Sketch https://packages.debian.org/sid/fonts-cabinsketch > > Montserrat, Nunito, Raleway, Source Sans Pro: texlive-fonts-extra > > > > This leaves 4 which I could not find in Debian: > > > > Nunito Sans https://github.com/googlefonts/NunitoSans > > Inter https://github.com/rsms/inter/ > > News Cycle https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~n8/newscycle/ > > Neucha ? > > Thanks a lot for this very helpful investigation. The problem now is > how to know which of the 60 inst/fonts/*.woff files we can remove from > the source package since these are not needed and whether the fonts > you said are found by bslib if we simply set the dependencies you > mentioned above (and how to test this). The names of these *.woff > files are absolutely cryptic and I need to admit I have no idea about > all this fonts stuff. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > > Best, > > Eric > > > > On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 14:34 Eric Brown <e...@ericebrown.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Since this is a pretty important package, I grep'd the package to see > > > what fonts are included. It looks like some of them are already in > > > Debian: > > > > > > Roboto https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/fonts-roboto > > > Ubuntu https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/fonts-ubuntu > > > Open Sans https://packages.debian.org/sid/fonts-open-sans > > > Lato https://packages.debian.org/sid/fonts-lato > > > Cabin Sketch https://packages.debian.org/sid/fonts-cabinsketch > > > > > > The rest are all SIL OFL licence (Debian compatible). I was able to find > > > sources for all but two: > > > > > > Montserrat https://github.com/JulietaUla/Montserrat > > > Nunito Sans https://github.com/googlefonts/NunitoSans > > > Nunito https://github.com/googlefonts/nunito > > > Inter https://github.com/rsms/inter/ > > > News Cycle https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~n8/newscycle/ > > > Raleway https://github.com/impallari/Raleway/ > > > Neucha ? > > > Source Sans Pro ? > > > > > > Best, > > > Eric > > > > > -- > > Eric Brown MD MSc FRCPC > > For encryption, OpenPGP public key available on request. > > -- > http://fam-tille.de -- Eric Brown MD MSc FRCPC For encryption, OpenPGP public key available on request.