19.04.2022 13:09, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
...> The way resolvconf expects it to work is to use the usual method,
and in case of an error, fall back to the upstream nameservers.
Since the upstream nameservers should be used as a fallback, I don't
see why this would be problematic.
hm.. now this is interesting.
In my understanding over the years, I expected the nameservers
received from/by DHCP should be used *first*. I did this with
unbound or dnsmasq even before resolvconf has been written -
using custom dhcp script to reconfigure local DNS resolver.
I don't even know unbund has a way to specify "fallback"
nameservers. You either set forwarders for a zone or you don't,
there's no _notion_ of fallback per se.
Now I wonder if my understanding is completely out of this world..
/mjt
