On April 20, 2022 11:39 am, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
> On April 20, 2022 12:33 am, Peter Michael Green wrote:
>> Package: rust-h2
>> Version: 0.1.26-1
>> X-debbugs-cc: d...@jones.dk
>> 
>> I noticed that Jonas had set a number of bugs about broken rust packages as
>> blockers of 900928, so I decided to take a look at some of them. I fixed up
>> bytemuck, image and related packages.
>> 
>> I then started looking at reqwest which lead me to h2 (which has been broken
>> since the tokio 1.x transition but noone ever got around to filing a 
>> bug) which
>> lead me to http which jonas recently NMU'd.
>> 
>> I feel I need to comment on the technical details of the NMU, I should 
>> preface
>> this by saying that I don't think it's unreasonable to 0-day NMU a minimal
>> fix for a long term RC issue, even if (as was not the case here but was the
>> case for some of the other NMUs noone ever bothered to actually file the
>> RC bug).
>> 
>> However, this NMU did considerably more than just add a minimal fix for
>> the rc issue. Most painfullly, the "orig" tarball for the new upstream 
>> version
>> appears to have been derived from upstream git rather than from crates.io
>> and this breaks our workflow. If you are going to 0-day stuff please keep
>> your uploads minimal. If you want to do more invasive NMUs please give
>> the maintainers a chance to respond.
>> 
>> Fortunately it seems the answer is to move to an even newer upstream
>> version. The only reverse dependencies of rust-http seem to be the
>> h2/hyper stack which badly needs an update to move away from tokio
>> 0.x. I have already committed the http update to debcargo-conf and may
>> upload it at some point.
>> 
>> Unfortunately moving back up the stack I ran into another issue. h2 and
>> hyper have grown a new dependency on tracing. While I am I am happy to
>> help with fixing existing rust packages, I am reluctant to take 
>> responsibility
>> for a new package unless it's something I personally use.
>> 
>> So this is where I personally tap out on h2/hyper until/unless someone
>> packages tracing.
> 
> we use this stack (h2/hyper) downstream, I can take care of it over the 
> coming weeks. tracing is unfortunately still rather in-flux, so it will 
> likely see frequent upgrades.

okay, just pushed the following to debcargo-conf:
- update of hyper
- update of httparse
- update of http-body
- switch of http to iota 1.x

currently progress is blocked on
- itoa/serde_json transition (anybody working actively on that?)
- tracing being uploaded (capitol?)
- tower-service being uploaded (NEW, RFS, please upload!)

once all of the above is in the archive, the current version of h2 also 
builds fine ;)

Reply via email to