Hefee <he...@debian.org> writes: > Control: severity -1 normal
Why do you insist on keeping broken packages in Debian? >> # envfrom2srs >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> File "/usr/bin/envfrom2srs", line 14, in <module> >> from ConfigParser import ConfigParser, DuplicateSectionError >> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'ConfigParser' >> >> # srs2envtol >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> File "/usr/bin/srs2envtol", line 14, in <module> >> from ConfigParser import ConfigParser, DuplicateSectionError >> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'ConfigParser' >> >> No need to clutter the archive with broken and untested packages. >> Please remove > > can you please use a less offensive language. Sorry. What's the less offensice way to describe broken and untested? > It is only the two example scripts, that are not properly ported to Python 3. You are installing known broken examples in $PATH? But why????! Well, whatever. Thanks for not caring about quality Bjørn
