On Thu, 26 May 2022 09:31:00 +0300 =?UTF-8?Q?Martin=2D=C3=89ric_Racine?= <martin-eric.rac...@iki.fi> wrote: > I'd really like to know how anyone could ever come to the conclusion > that a package that has nothing to do with graphic drivers needs to be > auto-removed. > > Martin-Éric > > On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 9:01 AM Debian testing autoremoval watch > <nore...@release.debian.org> wrote: > > > > upgrade-system 1.9.1.0 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2022-06-30 > > > > It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: > > 1011146: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470: CVE-2022-28181, CVE-2022-28183, > > CVE-2022-28184, CVE-2022-28185, CVE-2022-28191, CVE-2022-28192
> > https://bugs.debian.org/1011146 > > > > > > > > This mail is generated by: > > https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl > > > > Autoremoval data is generated by: > > https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl > > Same here: bitwise 0.43-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2022-06-30 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 1011146: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470: CVE-2022-28181, CVE-2022-28183, CVE-2022-28184, CVE-2022-28185, CVE-2022-28191, CVE-2022-28192 https://bugs.debian.org/1011146
