Package: coreutils Version: 8.32-4+b1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer,
I think the following transcript illustrates my point quite well :) -- >8 -- $ date +'%2z' +200 $ date +'%2:z' +2:00 $ date +'%2::z' +2:00:00 $ date +'%2:::z' +2 $ date +'%2::::z' %2::::z $ date +'%2Oz' +0200 $ date +'%2O:z' %O: $ date +'%2O::z' %O: $ date +'%2O:::z' %O: $ date +'%2O::::z' %2O::::z $ date +'%2Ez' +200 $ date +'%2E:z' +2:00 $ date +'%2E::z' +2:00:00 $ date +'%2E:::z' +2 $ date +'%2E::::z' %2E::::z -- >8 -- Identical output in C, en_GB, fa_IR, ja_JP. наб -- System Information: Debian Release: 11.3 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable-debug'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-15-amd64 (SMP w/24 CPU threads) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_GB:en Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages coreutils depends on: ii libacl1 2.2.53-10 ii libattr1 1:2.4.48-6 ii libc6 2.31-13+deb11u3 ii libgmp10 2:6.2.1+dfsg-1+deb11u1 ii libselinux1 3.1-3 coreutils recommends no packages. coreutils suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature