Package: coreutils
Version: 8.32-4+b1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

I think the following transcript illustrates my point quite well :)

-- >8 --
$ date +'%2z'
+200
$ date +'%2:z'
+2:00
$ date +'%2::z'
+2:00:00
$ date +'%2:::z'
+2
$ date +'%2::::z'
%2::::z

$ date +'%2Oz'
+0200
$ date +'%2O:z'
%O:
$ date +'%2O::z'
%O:
$ date +'%2O:::z'
%O:
$ date +'%2O::::z'
%2O::::z

$ date +'%2Ez'
+200
$ date +'%2E:z'
+2:00
$ date +'%2E::z'
+2:00:00
$ date +'%2E:::z'
+2
$ date +'%2E::::z'
%2E::::z
-- >8 --

Identical output in C, en_GB, fa_IR, ja_JP.

наб

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.3
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 
'stable-debug'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-15-amd64 (SMP w/24 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND, 
TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_GB:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages coreutils depends on:
ii  libacl1      2.2.53-10
ii  libattr1     1:2.4.48-6
ii  libc6        2.31-13+deb11u3
ii  libgmp10     2:6.2.1+dfsg-1+deb11u1
ii  libselinux1  3.1-3

coreutils recommends no packages.

coreutils suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to