Am Sonntag, dem 10.07.2022 um 20:27 -0700 schrieb Dima Kogan: > Markus Koschany <a...@debian.org> writes: > > > I have no strong preferences here. I would rebuild all > > reverse-dependencies with the multi-threaded version and see if that > > works. If this is successful, we could just drop single threaded > > support and re-use the existing binary packages (just bumping the > > SONAME and changing the version suffix). What do you think? > > Sounds fine by me. Do you already have a set of reverse dependencies in > mind?
I usually rebuild all reverse-dependencies with ratt. I believe there are five or six one of them. I can do it again when the new version is available. [1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ratt
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
