Hi On 2021-09-29 10:38:07 +0200, jo...@mister-muffin.de wrote: > In-reply-to: > From: Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <jo...@debian.org> > > Hi, > > On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 21:27:19 +0200 Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org> > wrote: > > On 2021-09-17 12:51:37 +0000, Bastien Roucariès wrote: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > Severity: normal > > > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > > > Usertags: transition > > > > > > Imagemagick changes some internal structures. Upstream bump so (safe), so > > > ask > > > for a rebuilt. > > > > Do all reverse dependencies build fine with the new Imagemagick version? > > If not, have bugs been filed? > > I have rebuilt all 399 source packages that have at least one binary produced > by src:imagemagick in their build dependency installation closure. Of those, > 16 > packages FTBFS with the imagemagick version form experimental but succeed with > the version from unstable. Of those, only one package (src:wand) is in the > list > from https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-imagemagick.html I filed > this failure as #995290 and will investigate the other 15 instances as well. > But since those source packages are not part of the transition, they should > probably not block this bug.
This transition completly dropped off my radar, sorry! What's the current status of the preparations? Have the bugs been filed? Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
