On 2022-07-14 16:23:16 +0200, Paolo Greppi wrote: > Hi Sebastian! > > Il 14/07/22 11:22, Sebastian Ramacher ha scritto: > > Control: tags 1000932 + patch > > Control: tags 1000932 + pending > > > > Dear maintainer, > > > > I've prepared an NMU for doxygen (versioned as 1.9.1-2.1) and > > uploaded it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I > > should delay it longer. > > > > Cheers > > thanks for the quick patch; alas your fix will break this logic: > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/doxygen/-/blob/master/debian/rules#L23 > which was contributed by Norbert Lange to fix > https://bugs.debian.org/945427. > > At this point I am unsure what effects this may cause, I only vaguely > remember that the Clang_DIR and LLVM_DIR env vars plug into cmake somehow. > > So I'd propose to skip this NMU, as I'd rather address this as part of the > new upstream release (https://bugs.debian.org/1013636). > With each upstream release, I usually run massive archive rebuilds with ratt > which helps pinpoint which of the ~700 paackages that reverse-build-dep on > doxygen might fail when the new version is pushed through.
ACK, I've canceled the NMU. Please consider that doxygen is a key package and thus effectively keeping llvm-toolchain-11 in testing. A timely fix for this issue would be much appreciated. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
