On Wed, 6 Jul 2022 21:42:22 +0200 Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> wrote: > > I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of you package on arm64 > because it was showing up as a regression for the upload of openssl. > I noticed that the test regularly fails and I saw failures on other > architectures too, even in stable. > > Because the unstable-to-testing migration software now blocks on > regressions in testing, flaky tests, i.e. tests that flip between > passing and failing without changes to the list of installed packages, > are causing people unrelated to your package to spend time on these > tests. > > Don't hesitate to reach out if you need help and some more information > from our infrastructure.
The autopkgtests work in Salsa but are also quite messy & the package isn't in great shape overall. For now, I'm going to adjust the dependencies to see if isotpsend support can be provided inside autopkgtest. If that fails, the upstream tests will need to be confined to Salsa and autopkgtests limited only to autopkgtest-pkg-python. https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/scapy/-/commit/59a4c0e2ed8c24cf5a3d4412cecdd5086a5b0395 -- Neil Williams ============= https://linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpScksa2k0y1.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
