Control: tag -1 + help moreinfo Hi Ben,
Quoting Michael Stapelberg (2022-09-15 08:57:47) > On Wed, 14 Sept 2022 at 08:10, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues > <jo...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 08 Jul 2022 02:35:50 -0400 Ben Westover <kwestover...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > wrote: I was trying to create an Ubuntu schroot for sbuild using the > > > command sbuild-debian-developer-setup --distribution=ubuntu --suite=jammy > > > and debootstrap failed because it tried to use apt-cacher-ng, which > > > doesn't work for Ubuntu if you're on Debian, and vice versa. This would > > > be solved with an option that can specify the mirror to use in place of > > > apt-cacher-ng. Alternatively, sbuild-debian-developer-setup could do a > > > sanity check on apt-cacher-ng, and if it fails, switch to > > > http://deb.debian.org/debian or http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu. > > > > I'm going to take care of the other sbuild-debian-developer-setup related > > bugs in the bts (#1014574 and #1006135 -- I am going to comply with both > > requests unless you have any objections). In turn, could you take care > > about this bug? > Unfortunately I don’t have time to do any development on > sbuild-debian-developer-setup, so I can’t help with this bug. > > Maybe Ben can try and send a patch? the package has "debian" in its name so I think it's fair to assume that a setup for ubuntu is not in its default scope. But maybe you can prepare a sensible patch and either send it to this bug or as a merge request on https://salsa.debian.org/debian/sbuild as suggested by Michael? Thanks! cheers, josch
signature.asc
Description: signature
