On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 17:07:55 -0700 Don Armstrong wrote: > Yes, that's correct; the processing for nnn-done@ doesn't do Control: > processing.
People often think that it does, don't notice that it doesn't and then bugs don't get updated properly. I have seen this a number of times. Personally I think it happens often enough that it would be worth making it work in nnn-done@ messages also, to avoid this problem. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
