> On 21. 9. 2022, at 20:35, Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + bullseye > > On Wed, 2022-09-21 at 13:47 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: >> nmu bind-dyndb-ldap_11.6-3 . ANY . bullseye . -m "rebuild for >> bind9_9.16.33-1~deb11u1" >> >> Hi, >> >> after the bind9_9.16.33-1~deb11u1 is release to bullseye-security, >> the >> bind-dyndb-ldap plugin will require binNMU. >> > > We can do that - once the packages are in p-u, because p-u chroots > don't pull in packages from the security archive - but it will mean > that users won't get the binNMUs until the next point release, which > probably isn't until November now. > > Is that OK?
Adding Paul, Salvatore and Timo into the bunch. I honestly don't know because I don't use this package, but I think it might prevent the users using the bind-dyndb-ldap users from upgrading the bind9 package. Should I then prepare a NMU for bullseye-security? Looks like only viable solution long-term would be to build all the bind plugins from the src:bind9 package, but it's too late for bullseye. Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý (He/Him) ond...@sury.org
