Yes, I think that is the same bug. Sorry to have opened a new case. Thanks, Regards _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 14:03:59 +0200 Bernhard Übelacker <bernha...@mailbox.org> wrote:
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x3daf0)[0x7f650123daf0] > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(+0x25103)[0x7f650178c103] > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(+0x1b6d8)[0x7f65017826d8] > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(+0x1bf5a)[0x7f6501782f5a] > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_object_new_with_properties+0x194)[0x7f65017843f4] > gimp(gimp_image_undo_push+0x1a7)[0x55fe29a3e787] > gimp(gimp_image_undo_push_text_layer+0x104)[0x55fe29a41344] > gimp(gimp_text_tool_apply+0x103)[0x55fe29770e93] Frames below signal handler are looking similar to #1018105.
