Hi Emmanuel,

On 17.10.22 01:28, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 16/10/2022 à 17:10, Philipp Kern a écrit :

While arm64/armhf remains unfixed (and could have its own t-p-u upload
based on the +0 version plus Ubuntu's patch), there's also a question if
a newer version would actually fix the issue.

I talked to Sebastian on IRC and we agreed that I'd upload the Ubuntu
patch for now. It doesn't make anything worse and will allow building
on amd64 again.

Hi Philipp,

Thank you for taking the time to look into the openjfx package. Do you know how difficult porting to ffmpeg 5.0 would be? The video support is a major feature of OpenJFX, removing it isn't ideal.

https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/blob/master/doc/APIchanges has the changes. It might not be too involving itself if it were up-to-date with the most recent ffmpeg pre-5.0. It's possible that it did not follow earlier deprecations. In the best case it's mostly moving around includes and deleting obsolete functions.

I did check upstream and couldn't find a ported version either. But then was also kind of left confused given the myriad of tags and a new repository location as well as the separate repository for the older version.

Kind regards and thanks
Philipp Kern

Reply via email to