Source: utox Version: 0.18.1-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),Your package has an autopkgtest, great. With a recent upload of glibc it started to fail on s390x. Looking at the history [1], I noticed that apparently the test can flip from passing for a while to failing for a while and back. Unfortunately, we don't keep the logs so long to inspect if previous (pre August 2022) failures were due to the same reason. Unfortunately, the output of the failure is rather limited (it seems there is more info logged, but that log file is not echoed to the autopkgtest log or stored as an autopkgtest artifact.
Can you please investigate the situation? At least this is a autopkgtest regression on a release architecture, but maybe (hopefully?) this points at more severe issues.
If you find out that it's really a regression in glibc functionality and the upload doesn't "just" trigger faulty behavior in utox, don't hesitate to reassign to glibc. Also, don't hesitate to contact the s390x porters if you need help figuring out this s390x specific issue.
Paul [1] https://ci.debian.net/packages/u/utox/testing/s390x/
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
