>>>>> "Salvatore" == Salvatore Bonaccorso <car...@debian.org> writes:

    Salvatore> We were originally thinking so (and Moritz added krb5 to
    Salvatore> the DSA needed list), as at least for 32bit architectures
    Salvatore> it might be possible to go beyond denial of service and
    Salvatore> potentially leading to remote code execution. But if your
    Salvatore> assesment on the issue makes you confident it's not DSA
    Salvatore> worthy we can re-evaluate.

So, looking at the code and the upstream advisory, it looks like the
information exposure vulnerability with cross-realm trust applies to
64-bit arches too.

Anyway I've fixed for unstable.
I  have a proposed fix for bullseye on the bullseye branch of
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/krb5.
Can you take a look and see if I did that right?  Do you want me to
upload that, or would you rather upload to the security queue?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to