Hi, can someone do a minimal patch proposing a way to solve this issue?
So we can discuss the best way to solve it, before doing the big work of solving it. I am going to check why this is out of my radar. Kind regards Jose M Calhariz On December 4, 2022 4:56:51 AM GMT+00:00, Mathias Gibbens <gib...@debian.org> wrote: > I also would like to see this bug fixed, as a server I've got running >bookworm is spamming log events due to the default date format having >changed in rsyslog. > > Jose -- I'd be happy to help out by co-maintaining the logcheck >package. The logcheck repo is in the debian group on salsa, so by >convention technically it's open for any DD to contribute to, but I >don't want to just start doing uploads without first seeing if you >would have any objections. > > Stefan and Richard -- Hopefully we'll be able to get this bug >resolved pretty quickly. If you have patches for a suggested change or >(even better) a script to automate changing all the rule files, please >feel free to add it to this bug report, or open a pull request on >salsa. > >Mathias > > PS -- There might be an email loop, so I've specifically CC'ed Jose >on this email. The current Maintainer email address for logcheck is the >"magic" logch...@packages.debian.org address that will forward messages >to the package's maintainer, but because that's the exact same address >it might be looping/dropping messages. I'm not sure if there's logic in >place to also email "real" addresses listed as Uploaders for a package >or not....
