On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 05:29:25PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote: > On Wednesday, 21 December 2022 17:11:55 CET Diederik de Haas wrote: > > Given that it worked with 6.0 but no more with 6.1-1~exp1 which I assume is > > a self-built kernel from current master, it seems more likely to be an > > upstream issue/regression. > > I just noticed the following part from that linux-amlogic post: > > I native build kernel from debian's kernel repo: > > https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/ with some Amlogic patches: > > https://salsa.debian.org/zhangn1985/linux/-/tree/master/debian/patches/feat > > ures/arm64/meson all follow debian's kernel config. original patches are: https://salsa.debian.org/zhangn1985/linux/-/tree/master/debian/patches/features/npu and 0001, 0002, 0004, 0005, 0006, 0007, 0021, 0022, 0037 in https://salsa.debian.org/zhangn1985/linux/-/tree/master/debian/patches/features/khadas
> > That path doesn't seem to exist anymore, but got redirected to 'just' the > master branch and noticed the latest commit "update patches from khadas". > When I looked into that, I saw there were a LOT of additional patches :-O > https://salsa.debian.org/zhangn1985/linux/-/tree/master/debian/patches/ > features/khadas I just want to apply all vendor patches to check whether wifi works. you can review all patches, it not related to WIFI, thus I don't think WIFI could magicly work. > > The test I suggested in my previous reply would still be useful, but it could > also be that your patch-set is at fault. this is reasonable suspect. I also use default debian kernel: https://packages.debian.org/experimental/arm64/linux-image-6.1.0-0-arm64/download WIFI stop work in 2mins. Logs are same, I don't duplicate. Default debian kernel 6.0 is good, and 6.1 is bad, this is a regression. upstream and vendor said they didn't see this issue, thus report to debian for help. BR. Ning.