Hi, I was discussing with Christian Perrier at dinner and he mentioned that the new-style architecture specifications (Build-Depends: XXX [linux-any] etc.) may have been reverted. I'm not quite sure about that since the documentation and changelogs are quite scarse about dpkg-dev stuff.
Am I okay in going ahead with committing this change to pbuilder ? I am personally against supporting new debian/control construct to pbuilder before the next stable release with dpkg supporting that contstruct, but if there is need within Debian archive, I would add this feature. regards, junichi At Mon, 15 May 2006 09:41:06 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > At Mon, 15 May 2006 03:08:31 +0900, > Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > Have you actually tested this patch? > > > > ARCH is the current running architecture, which won't be linux-any etc. > > > > regards, > > junichi > > > > [09:36:45]ibookg4:tmp> /usr/lib/pbuilder/pbuilder-satisfydepends --echo > -> Attempting to parse the build-deps : pbuilder-satisfydepends,v 1.24 > 2006/03/31 00:14:31 dancer Exp $ > -> Considering libasound2 [linux-any] > -> This package is not for this architecture > -> Installing > apt-get -y --force-yes install > -> Finished parsing the build-deps > [09:36:50]ibookg4:tmp> /usr/lib/pbuilder/pbuilder-satisfydepends --echo > -> Attempting to parse the build-deps : pbuilder-satisfydepends,v 1.25 > 2006/05/14 18:32:32 dancer Exp $ > -> Considering libasound2 [linux-any] > -> Trying libasound2 > -> Installing libasound2 > apt-get -y --force-yes install libasound2 > -> Finished parsing the build-deps > > > tested locally, it seems to be functioning fine, cool. > Applied. > > > > regards, > junichi > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]