Marc Haber wrote: > I'll probably remove the check since aide depends on liblockfile1 in > these days, and thus dotlockfile is guaranteed to be present. > Objections?
That would be fine. Anything that simplifies the script is a good thing in my mind. > Yes, and it also says that using which is an acceptable alternative > for scripts that don't run early in system startup. In Debian use of 'which' is fine. (On Debian 'which' is a shell script with different behavior than traditional systems. On other systems 'which' is a csh script and has different behavior not suitable to this task. But on Debian it is fine.) > I hate that idea. Huge complexity added. I am okay with the use of 'which' to detect the command. As it was I was simply following the published guidelines. Avoiding this entirely and using the package dependency I like better. But since the test was there in the script I assumed that it was the maintainer's preference to have a test there. Bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]