Source: eliom Version: 9.4.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | Install package build dependencies > | > +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > > > Setup apt archive > ----------------- > > Merged Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13), dh-ocaml, ocaml, > ocaml-findlib, ocamlbuild, libppx-deriving-ocaml-dev, libjs-of-ocaml-dev (>= > 3.6.0), libjs-of-ocaml-ocamlbuild-ocaml-dev, liblwt-log-ocaml-dev, > liblwt-ocaml-dev, libtyxml-ocaml-dev (>= 4.4.0), libocsigenserver-ocaml-dev > (>= 5.0.0), libocsipersist-ocaml-dev, libipaddr-ocaml-dev (>= 2.1), > libreactivedata-ocaml-dev (>= 0.2.1), libppxlib-ocaml-dev (>= 0.15.0), > opam-installer, build-essential, fakeroot > Filtered Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13), dh-ocaml, ocaml, > ocaml-findlib, ocamlbuild, libppx-deriving-ocaml-dev, libjs-of-ocaml-dev (>= > 3.6.0), libjs-of-ocaml-ocamlbuild-ocaml-dev, liblwt-log-ocaml-dev, > liblwt-ocaml-dev, libtyxml-ocaml-dev (>= 4.4.0), libocsigenserver-ocaml-dev > (>= 5.0.0), libocsipersist-ocaml-dev, libipaddr-ocaml-dev (>= 2.1), > libreactivedata-ocaml-dev (>= 0.2.1), libppxlib-ocaml-dev (>= 0.15.0), > opam-installer, build-essential, fakeroot > dpkg-deb: building package 'sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy' in > '/<<RESOLVERDIR>>/apt_archive/sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy.deb'. > Ign:1 copy:/<<RESOLVERDIR>>/apt_archive ./ InRelease > Get:2 copy:/<<RESOLVERDIR>>/apt_archive ./ Release [963 B] > Ign:3 copy:/<<RESOLVERDIR>>/apt_archive ./ Release.gpg > Get:4 copy:/<<RESOLVERDIR>>/apt_archive ./ Sources [513 B] > Get:5 copy:/<<RESOLVERDIR>>/apt_archive ./ Packages [598 B] > Fetched 2074 B in 0s (150 kB/s) > Reading package lists... > Reading package lists... > > Install main build dependencies (apt-based resolver) > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Installing build dependencies > Reading package lists... > Building dependency tree... > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created > or been moved out of Incoming. > The following information may help to resolve the situation: > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > libcstruct-ocaml : Depends: libparsexp-ocaml-rab81 but it is not installable > Depends: libsexplib-ocaml-fzmc6 but it is not installable > libcstruct-ocaml-dev : Depends: libparsexp-ocaml-dev-rab81 but it is not > installable > Depends: libsexplib-ocaml-dev-fzmc6 but it is not > installable > libocsigenserver-ocaml-dev : Depends: libangstrom-ocaml-dev-fv181 but it is > not installable > Depends: libcohttp-lwt-ocaml-dev-62q63 > Depends: libcohttp-lwt-unix-ocaml-dev-8ke06 > Depends: libcohttp-ocaml-dev-nhwd0 > Depends: libconduit-lwt-ocaml-dev-6bmb5 > Depends: libconduit-ocaml-dev-tg333 > Depends: libcryptokit-ocaml-dev-1g7t3 but it is > not installable > Depends: libocsigenserver-ocaml-d22y6 > Depends: liburi-ocaml-dev-bqtr1 > E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. > apt-get failed. The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2023/02/03/eliom_9.4.0-2_unstable.log All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20230203;users=lu...@debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20230203&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.