Hi, Pierre Gruet: Thanks for your kind advice. > I think it is really fine to care for this package now, but as we are in > the soft freeze period, I would upload to experimental: I used > japi-compliance-checker to see the differences between the jars in > version 4.2-1 and in (your candidate) 4.4-1, and there has been a small > number of (upstream) return types changes. The number of > reverse-dependencies is too large to be tested with ratt at home.
All the warnings are solved and please see Upload #3. But for the ratt, it’s really a headache for me too. Could I leave it for the Debian CI ? Please tell me if there are any issues still need to be fixed. Best !
