On 25 February 2023 14:57:28 UTC, Scott Kitterman <deb...@kitterman.com> wrote: >Generally favorably, but I'd rather wait for upstream to agree on it, >otherwise it may be a patch we have to maintain forever.
Now we maintain the tfm bits. >What's their reaction to the change? No reply so far. The first few patches from early January got the response "it was a chaotic week, we get to it soon" and the tfm patch got no response since I posted it last week. Maybe you need to walk around their office and throw a stone with pull request number written on it :-) > >It's also late in the release cycle to do it (not definitely a problem, but >calls for caution). > >Scott K -- Sebastian
