On Thu 2023-03-02 19:51:17 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 08:54:04AM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> On Thu 2023-03-02 07:52:55 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>> >> I have rejected the current package so we can re-use the version later
>> >> one, when this is fixed.
>> >
>> > Cofnirmed it was renamed in v4.4 upstream. I have put a comment on
>> > upstream issue about backports to older versions.
>> 
>> Gah sorry about that, i should have done more extensive testing against
>> the version in stable.  Thank you for the reject, that was the right
>> thing to do.
>> 
>> i've already published the signed tag in git, so i'm inclined to *not*
>> reuse the version number, but instead move directly to +deb11u3 with the
>> fixed patch.  
>
> Personally, I did reject with the intention of reusing the version.
> But if you do not want to repush a fresh signed tag, then let's to so,
> please fix the patch on top of +deb11u2, as +deb11u3. In this case
> please build as well with -v4.3-1+deb11u1 so that we include both
> changelog entries, including the bugcloser.
>
> Does that work well enough for you?

yep, works for me, thanks.  I'll do that later this evening or tomorrow
morning.

        --dkg

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to