Quoting Brian White ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

>               o  a network interface name (such as eth0). This may
>               include shell-like wildcards so eth* will match any
>               interface starting with the sub-string "eth"
> 
> This last part implies that all shell wildcards can be used, but that
> is not the case.  I tried "eth[1-9]" and it failed.  If only "*" or "?" 
> are supported, then that should be stated explicitly.
> 
> Or, it could be improved to use these patterns!


Well, I think that's debatable as the man page doesn't make the
assumption that all shell wildcards are supported.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to