On Tue, 16 May 2006, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 07:03:22PM -0500, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > following the discussion here on debconf about "Representing Debian", we > > decided to try to use two new lists to coordinate the communication of > > Debian to the external world. > > > > Name: > > debian-publicity@lists.debian.org > > Seconded. > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Not seconded. Rationale: I don't see why to create this list and why not > to simply keep using the press@ alias, which is archived for DDs on > master, just like lists are. Subscription is going to be controlled > anyway.
Why couldn't DD subscribe themselves without control? You use the hash-token subscription method but you only allow it for @debian.org email. I don't see the point of not using a list since the informations are available, we ought to make it easy to be able to follow what's going on instead of having to setup a scary script to follow the archived mbox. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/
