Package: gcc-11 Followup-For: Bug #1005863 X-Debbugs-Cc: martin-eric.rac...@iki.fi
> So my guess is that approximately 6-7% of i386 packages in bookworm _that > contain binaries or shared libraries_ are susceptible to this bug. ... > It's also a larger number of packages than we could expect individual > maintainers to adjust their buildflags for on any realistic timescale - so > either a Debian-specific patch or upstream fix would be required to continue > to > support Geode LX (in my opinion, and assuming that the script and report are > accurate-enough to be guiding indicators). This reporting was, in fact, too optimistic; the check.sh script had a bug that meant it wasn't inspecting '*.a' files (even though it was including them in the per-package binary/library counts). With this fix in place: -done < <(find "${PACKAGE}" -type f -a -executable -o -name '*.so' -print0) 2>/dev/null; +done < <(find "${PACKAGE}" -type f -a \( -executable -o -name '*.so' -o -name '*.a' \) -print0) 2>/dev/null; ... the report summary at the time-of-writing is: 2467 1639 345 ... and so it seems that the percentage of susceptible packages for arch i386 in bookworm could be closer to 20%.