Hi,

On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 9:50 AM Markus Viitamäki <mar...@viitamaki.net> wrote:
>
> Wait a second..
>
> It works for me now also, but the only thing I have changed is the changes 
> from your apparmor MR in #1033640.
> I feel stupid now, but the problem seems to be fixed by the apparmor change..
>
> lsof -Pni | grep -i kea
> kea-dhcp4 21119        _kea   15u  IPv4 1214014      0t0  UDP 172.XX.XX.5:67
> kea-dhcp6 22424        _kea   15u  IPv6 1334939      0t0  UDP 
> [2a0e:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX::5]:547
> kea-dhcp6 22424        _kea   16u  IPv6 1334941      0t0  UDP 
> [fe80::250:56ff:fe96:dfb3]:547
> kea-dhcp6 22424        _kea   17u  IPv6 1334944      0t0  UDP [ff02::1:2]:547
>
> It serves clients correctly now, so I am happy. But confused..

The apparmor change included a whole abstraction now, and not just a
rule to allow a certain protocol, so one of these other rules might
have done it. Or maybe you didn't spot the apparmor DENIED message
before in the logs, or it was not shown due to throttling.

Please keep an eye on it, as there are periodic jobs run by the
servers (kea-lfc comes to mind), and the dhcp6 daemon wasn't as tested
with apparmor as the dhcp4 one.

Reply via email to