I've just switched to tulip from de4x5 on my alpha, and none of the problems that were present previously appear to persist under 2.4.27-2. So I don't have any objections to blacklisting de4x5.
OTOH, I also can't find anything in the current kernel-image 2.6.8-2 packages that explains why the de4x5 module is being chosen here, as it doesn't appear in modules.pcimap. Would this have been a discover bug instead, after all? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
