Hi,[reducing the people in CC, hope I didn't drop too many and those still there are interested]
On Mon, 29 May 2023 00:14:10 +0000 Mathias Gibbens <gib...@debian.org> wrote:
What version of lxcfs is currently installed on the ci.debian.net machines? I'm guessing from the kernel version they've been upgraded to bookworm, so lxcfs should be at 5.0.3-1, but I'd like to clarify that.
I just ran $(apt-cache show lxcfs | grep Version) on all the worker hosts and indeed they all run 5.0.3-1.
lxcfs 5.0.3-1 does indeed include the referenced fix for upstream issue #553, and has been in testing since 2023-01-22. If the CI machines have that version installed, then I'd lean towards a related but distinct issue than the one identified at the moment.
Is there more information I can get for you from one of the effected architectures?
PaulPS: I missed former messages due to a minor mistake in my address, but I'm now subscribed.
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
