Hi,

I hit this issue when testing a bugfix for memtest86+ under QEMU. 
Before finding this bug report, I worked around it by taking OVMF 
non-secboot binaries from an Arch package, but I agree with Alain: 
non-secboot binaries are useful, and besides, multiple (most ?) other 
distros provide them :)

For memtest86+, testing 32-bit UEFI binaries in QEMU once in every 
while arguably provides useful test coverage for the goal of 
supporting a broad range of x86 & x86_64 computers: physical 
computers which provide 32-bit UEFI boot support but not legacy BIOS 
boot support are rather uncommon.


Regards,
Lionel Debroux.

Reply via email to