Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/ndmitchell/hoogle/issues/359
Hi Iustin, On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 11:25PM, Iustin Pop wrote: > AFAIK, both armel and armfh are low-powered/"slow" arches, but i386 is > surprising. Maybe due to memory limits? > > I wonder if tests shouldn't simply be restricted to amd64, arm64, ppc64el and > s390x? This should give it enough of architecture heterogeneity to catch > any problems that simply do not appear on amd64 (mainstream arch) (yes, > I've been bitten by this in one package of mine). > > This would be a cheap fix (one entry in the control file). Thoughts? > (Anyone?) It seems this bug is the only one that prevents it from > entering testing (and it's a leaf package). Unfortunately it's not just the tests that fail, hoogle is currently completely broken on all 32-bit architectures. We need to either fix it, or remove hoogle from these architectures. Best, -- Ilias
