On Friday 19 May 2006 17:34, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > Though still I'd like to know what upstream thinks about the name of the > language. I asked on #asterisk-dev and was suggested to use "pt_br" > rather than "br". The ISO639-1 language name "br" is Breton, BTW.
I don't have any idea why it's "br" not pt_br or even pt_BR (which would probably be even more correct, IMHO). It's just is. All "br" references comes from the following files that makes me think it's pretty fine, although I don't understand why the 639-1 name, not 8859-1: /etc/asterisk/indications.conf:country=br /etc/asterisk/sip.conf:language=br /etc/asterisk/unicall.conf:language=br /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf:language=br No other file has "br" set up and since it's a channel configuration, I think it's a bug in both zapata.conf and unicall.conf, not in this patch, right? Sorry if I got it wrong, maybe I just missed something, Tzafrir :-) Cheers! -- caio[1982] begotti http://caio.ueberalles.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
