Hi! On Sat, 2023-02-25 at 03:58:34 +0000, peter green wrote: > As far as the current description goes, I think it's generally not > too bad but I think there are some minor improvements that could be > made.
[…] > * I feel it lacks a bit in "big picture", I *think* sqv is the main > command line tool for the sequoia project. If that is the case > it would be nice to say so expliciltly and upfront. The main CLI is sq. The sqv CLI is intended to be the equivalent of gpgv, as in a verification only tool, where the full blown thing is not necessary. > Also since > people will be comparing it with gpg it might be an idea to point > out explicitly whether things like web of trust support are > included. AFAIK there's a separate sq-wot tool for this. Other related projects include sq-keyring-linter and sqop, or even the GnuPG Chameleon, or openpgp-cert-d among others. > * I'm not sure a list of subcommands belongs in a package > description or if the description would be better sticking > to describing functionality. Given that the CLI is still in flux, I guess for now it might be helpful, but perhaps a more descriptive one might be better, dunno. Thanks, Guillem