Control: unmerge 1024765
Control: notfound 855428 0.22.13+nmu1
Control: notfound 1024765 0.22.7

On 2022-11-24 15:25:10 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Control: forcemerge 855428 -1
> 
> After a closer look, this seems to be the same bug as 855428,
> where there is the same behavior and same explanation.

In bug 855428, the user wasn't using a foreign architecture as
mentioned below, so the behavior should probably be different.
So, unmerge and correcting the "found" values to the original
ones.

I will merge 1024765 to 858337 instead (but I'm going to look
at other bugs too).

> There seems to be a difference: for bug 855428, there was apparently
> no foreign architecture; it just says "apt-show-versions is looking
> into different architectures' archives which happen to be on the same
> disk" and the "apt-cache policy" doesn't show a foreign architecture
> there, while I get:
> 
> cventin:~> apt-cache policy clang-14-doc
> clang-14-doc:
>   Installed: 1:14.0.6-8
>   Candidate: 1:14.0.6-8
>   Version table:
>      1:14.0.6-10~exp1 1
>           1 https://ftp.debian.org/debian experimental/main amd64 Packages
>           1 https://ftp.debian.org/debian experimental/main i386 Packages
>  *** 1:14.0.6-8 500
>         500 https://ftp.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages
>         100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
>      1:14.0.6-6 500
>         500 https://ftp.debian.org/debian unstable/main i386 Packages
>      1:14.0.6-2 500
>         500 https://ftp.debian.org/debian testing/main amd64 Packages
>         500 https://ftp.debian.org/debian testing/main i386 Packages
> 
> So I'm not sure of the exact rules to select the package version.
> Anyway, this is inconsistent with apt and aptitude.

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)

Reply via email to