Control: unmerge 1024765 Control: notfound 855428 0.22.13+nmu1 Control: notfound 1024765 0.22.7
On 2022-11-24 15:25:10 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Control: forcemerge 855428 -1 > > After a closer look, this seems to be the same bug as 855428, > where there is the same behavior and same explanation. In bug 855428, the user wasn't using a foreign architecture as mentioned below, so the behavior should probably be different. So, unmerge and correcting the "found" values to the original ones. I will merge 1024765 to 858337 instead (but I'm going to look at other bugs too). > There seems to be a difference: for bug 855428, there was apparently > no foreign architecture; it just says "apt-show-versions is looking > into different architectures' archives which happen to be on the same > disk" and the "apt-cache policy" doesn't show a foreign architecture > there, while I get: > > cventin:~> apt-cache policy clang-14-doc > clang-14-doc: > Installed: 1:14.0.6-8 > Candidate: 1:14.0.6-8 > Version table: > 1:14.0.6-10~exp1 1 > 1 https://ftp.debian.org/debian experimental/main amd64 Packages > 1 https://ftp.debian.org/debian experimental/main i386 Packages > *** 1:14.0.6-8 500 > 500 https://ftp.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > 1:14.0.6-6 500 > 500 https://ftp.debian.org/debian unstable/main i386 Packages > 1:14.0.6-2 500 > 500 https://ftp.debian.org/debian testing/main amd64 Packages > 500 https://ftp.debian.org/debian testing/main i386 Packages > > So I'm not sure of the exact rules to select the package version. > Anyway, this is inconsistent with apt and aptitude. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)