Hi, Help is welcome on the imagemagick side. You could step in as a maint or test salsa tree
Le lun. 24 juil. 2023 à 17:21, Darshaka Pathirana <d...@syn-net.org> a écrit : > > Hi, > > On Fri, 03 Sep 2021 22:00:12 +0000 Debian FTP Masters > <ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org> wrote: > > Source: imagemagick > > Source-Version: 8:6.9.12.20+dfsg1-1 > > Done: Bastien Roucariès <ro...@debian.org> > > If just stumbled over this: > > ❯ identify -format "%f: %wx%h\n" "DSC_0597.NEF" > identify-im6.q16: delegate failed `'ufraw-batch' --silent --create-id=also > --out-type=png --out-depth=16 --output='%u.png' '%i'' @ > error/delegate.c/InvokeDelegate/1966. > identify-im6.q16: unable to open image > `/tmp/magick-vD_smqp7YJHGABZ2bxgam6OJlqxQ5NMN.ppm': No such file or directory > @ error/blob.c/OpenBlob/2924. > > I am still running Debian/bullseye, but as far as I can see version > 6.9.12.20+dfsg1-1 is only in experimental. > Any plans to bring it to unstable? > > Apart from that, imagemagick-6.q16 + imagemagick-6.q16hdri do still have > "Suggests: ufraw-batch"[1][2]. > This should be removed. > > [1] > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/imagemagick/-/blob/debian/lastest/debian/control?ref_type=heads#L200 > [2] > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/imagemagick/-/blob/debian/lastest/debian/control?ref_type=heads#L411 > > And finally: is there a workaround for this problem, as Debian/bullseye + > bookworm still seem to be affected by this bug? > Should we open a new issue or re-open this bug? > > Thx for maintaining! > > Best, > - Darsha