On 2023-08-08 20:46, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Hi Benjamin, > > On 2022-12-06 11:15, Benjamin Barenblat wrote: > > Control: owner 1025221 ! > > Control: tags 1025221 - patch > > > > Hi, Manuel, > > > > Yesterday, I tried a build on a porterbox with your patch. It looks like > > disabling parallelism improves the situation but does not completely > > solve it; absl_mutex_test is still flaky. I’ll continue investigating > > and see if I can get that test fixed. > > > > In the meantime, it looks like a recent binNMU to Abseil on riscv64 has > > passed the buildds. Does that unblock your work? > > Thanks for your upload fixing #1037567. Unfortunately it appears that we > are now bitten by this bug with a failure in the testsuite. Would that > be possible to use the same patch that you applied to the experimental > branch? [1] While it doesn't fully fix the issue, it increases the > chance for the testsuite to path.
I haven't seen the message of Stephane before sending my email. His suggestion to make the test failures non-fatal on riscv64 on make fully sense to avoid blocking the bootstrap of riscv64. There are only 2 builds failures in the testsuite, the majority of it passes. Therefore please go ahead with his patch. We will continue to work on the issue to provide the real fix. Regards Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://aurel32.net
