On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:45:35PM +0100, Paul Cupis wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 09:09:22AM +0100, Paul Cupis wrote: > >> tag 367618 + patch > >> thanks > >> > >> Please find attached my patch which moves libexpect5.43.so back into the > >> expect package. > >> > >> expect-dev Depends on expect, so the shared object will available to > >> link with (re: bug #367325). > > > > Well the real fix would be to package the library following Debian > > policy... > > Well yes, of course. My patch was an attempt as a small patch to resolve > the (symptoms of) the reported bug, not a reworking of the whole > package. The maintainer can decide how they want to handle it (I do not > intend to NMU with this patch atm).
Hello Paul, The comment was really intended for the maintainer. I took the liberty to upload a NMU with your patch because this bug caused other packages to FTBFS. Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
