On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 02:01:37 +0100 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C1ngel?= <b...@debian.16bits.net> wrote: > I have tested https://salsa.debian.org/debian/gpgme/-/merge_requests/1 > and it works fine. > I would however name the new package gpgme-json, not libgpgme-bin > > The package is only providing gpgme-json(1). If it is going to ship > more binaries in the future, it can always be replaced. If someone is > told they need gpgme-json the expected package name is 'gpgme-json', > not libgpgme-bin. Plus, that lib prefix is even more confusing. > > Even the description (“This package contains the gpgme-json binary to > access GPGME...”) seem to ask for that name. > > That is the only nitpick I have. It "just works". :-) > > The debian/changelog would need updating, and rebased on top of gpgme > 1.18 (bookworm/sid) from the current 1.14.
How about just playing the binary into a package name "gpgme", like Fedora does https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/gpgme/gpgme/fedora-rawhide.html#files
