On Sat, 19 Aug 2023 at 18:57:29 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > If you are happy with the results and coverage from unstable, would > you be open to prepare/finalize next the respective updates for > bookworm-security and bullseye-security?
I already had them in what I believe to be an uploadable state, so I've uploaded them to security-master. Please do whatever testing you feel is appropriate and approve or reject. librsvg_2.54.7+dfsg-1~deb12u1 is a trivial backport of what's in unstable, <https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/librsvg/-/merge_requests/19> (diff vs. unstable below, debdiff vs. bookworm attached). I've been using it on a bookworm GNOME desktop for the last few weeks with no apparent regressions, and I haven't seen any regression reports from testing/unstable users either. librsvg_2.50.3+dfsg-1+deb11u1 is <https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/librsvg/-/merge_requests/20> (debdiff vs. bullseye attached). I don't have bullseye on actual hardware any more, so this has only been tested on a GNOME VM. smcv -------- diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index d58c430b1..825f50e1e 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +librsvg (2.54.7+dfsg-1~deb12u1) bookworm-security; urgency=medium + + * Team upload + * Rebuild for bookworm-security + + -- Simon McVittie <s...@debian.org> Sun, 30 Jul 2023 17:13:13 +0100 + librsvg (2.54.7+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=high * Team upload diff --git a/debian/gbp.conf b/debian/gbp.conf index 4ed071a96..098b7f22b 100644 --- a/debian/gbp.conf +++ b/debian/gbp.conf @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ [DEFAULT] pristine-tar = True -debian-branch = debian/master -upstream-branch = upstream/latest +debian-branch = debian/bookworm +upstream-branch = upstream/2.54.x [buildpackage] sign-tags = True
librsvg_2.50.3+dfsg-1+deb11u1.debdiff.gz
Description: application/gzip
librsvg_2.54.7+dfsg-1~deb12u1.debdiff.gz
Description: application/gzip
