Hi, Upgrading to 6.2 does not introduce any jtreg regressions in openjdk-11 and -17.
Best Regards, Vladimir. On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 7:06 AM tony mancill <tmanc...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 09:28:39AM +1200, Vladimir Petko wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The build.xml is not supported by the upstream, so I have updated the > > patch to include rule changes to use the provided Makefile[1]. > > > > Changes: > > * Use Makefile to build jtreg (LP: #2031041). > > - Use --release option in Makefile compile options. > > - d/p/*: drop build.xml patches. > > - d/control: add libguice-java, zip. > > Hello Vladimir, hi Emmanuel: > > Vladimir, thank you for this patch (and others). I applied it to the > current source repo and rebuild all of the build r-deps before I > realized that the source repo contains 6.2+1 [1] (not 6.1+2), which > hasn't been uploaded. > > Are there any considerations or concerns about going ahead with an > upload of 6.2+1? As I said, I was able to build openjdk-11, -17, and > -19 with that version. > > Thanks, > tony > > [1] > https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/jtreg/-/commit/18fe40fc470b04bc735b425bba250db61340fcb3