On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 10:38:52AM +0200, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > Hi Adam, Hi Em!
> On 2023-08-16 05:14, Adam Borowski wrote: > > This is not a regression, thus why would it be a bug? > > Well FTBFS is a bug isn't it? :-) A FTBFS on an architecture that has built before (and hasn't been RMed) is a bug, and one that's policied as high severity. A FTBFS that's not a regression is a wishlist, a porting opportunity. And here it's not even a build failure but a failure to install b-deps. Obviously we'd prefer thunderbird:armhf to be a thing, but unless/until it can be fixed, talk about thunderbird addons on armhf is quite moot. And the way b-deps are written, the moment thunderbird:armhf hits incoming its addons get enabled in wanna-build, with no human action needed. > > There's nothing in birdtray itself that would prevent it from being built on > > these architectures the moment problems in thunderbird are resolved > > Why does birdtray build-depend on thunderbird? It seems to build > perfectly fine in a clean armhf chroot without it. Build yes, work no. The result would be a pointless package you can't use; adding this (otherwise superfluous) build-dependency avoids having a non-installable package in the archive. Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ An imaginary friend squared is a real enemy. ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀
