On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:19:10AM -0500, Ambrose Li wrote:
[...snip...]
> The magnification I observed is more like: If I need to "magnify" the
> width (e.g., in object properties) to make the line the expected width
> again (in step 3 above), the line in the printout has the same
> "magnification". For example, if I originally drew a line of width 1
> and shortened it to 50% original length, the line will be only 0.5
> wide, and I'll need to re-type "1" in object properties. When printed,
> the line has width 2 (length unaffected). If I had shortened the line
> to 1/3 original length and later corrected the width, the printout
> would show the line having width 3 (length unaffected).
> 
> I mentioned the problem on inkscape's jabber channel and was told to
> file a bug upstream. If I file a bug upstream, what should I do to
> the debian bug I filed?
> 
> Best regards,
> Ambrose

Hi Ambrose,

thanks for your cooperation. Please tag the bug as forwarded to the
upstream authors, e.g. using the programme bts with
bts forwarded 296829 <web-address of the sourceforge bug>
If the bug is closed in cvs we can tag it fixed-upstream and I can close
the bug when a new version which includes the fix is uploaded to
unstable.

With best regards,

Wolfi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to