Hi, On 24/09/23 at 16:09 -0700, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 05:12:21PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > Could we use the Debian AWS account to host that service? > > > > I would assume that a service like snapshot would be within the scope > > for our AWS usage. Noah? > > It makes sense and I will look into it. Let's not start anything until > we hear definitive confirmation. Do we have a sense of how much > outgoing traffic the current snapshot service generates?
>From #debian-admin: <Mithrandir> lucas: https://munin.debian.org/debian.org/sallinen.debian.org/ip_193_62_202_27.html and https://munin.debian.org/debian.org/sallinen.debian.org/ip_2001_630_206_4000_1a1a_0_c13e_ca1b.html I think, so average of 35Mbit/sec over the last week. > > However we need to talk about that "one […] VM", because this sounds > > like you intend to use AWS as VM hosting, which it is not. > > > > Please think about this in form of services and there should be at least > > two: > > - the injestor, which can only exist once and writes, and > > - the web frontend, which should be able to exist several times and only > > reads. > > > > So you want to plan with running the multiple web frontends with load > > balancers and maybe even cloudfront. > > I agree that it would be best to design something more cloud-oriented. > However, if there's an existing infrastructure that can be moved as a > "lift & shift" into AWS now, with architectural refactoring happening > later, that's an OK place to start. Yes, that would be the plan I think: start with moving to AWS and replacing the filesystem-backed storage backend to an S3-backed on. Then look at other aspects. Lucas