Hi, Am 4. Oktober 2023 17:05:16 MESZ schrieb Laura Arjona Reina <larj...@debian.org>: >Hello all >Sorry for jumping into the thread withour having reading all of it, but the >changes to the website cron jobs to build the trixie release notes (MR 13) >have been integrated in the codebase (see >https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/cron/-/blob/master/parts/7release-notes > ) and we're getting an error in the build process (hence the recent "ddp >build failed" message in the debian-doc list). > >I think there are two issues:
Thanks for the quick merge. That being done now, I need to push the 'Migrate r-n to restructuredText' changings to master. Please be patient. Holger >A) > >7release-notes script now calls for trixie >(https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/cron/-/blob/master/parts/7release-notes#L208 > ): > >make install DESTDIR=$crondir/tmp >> $notesdir/build.log 2>&1 > >while for the other releases the call is >(https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/cron/-/blob/master/parts/7release-notes#L242 > ) > > >make -C $notesdir/release-notes publish \ > PUBLISHTARBALL=yes PUBLISHDIR=$webtopdir/www/releases/$release >> > $notesdir/build.log 2>&1 > >I believe that the Makefile of release-notes understands "publish" instead of >"install" but I'm not sure about how should we update L208 of the >7release-notes script. > >B) >On the other hand, if I look at the master branch of the release-notes repo, I >see that it's still written in docbook, not restructuredtext. >I guess the files in the new format are still in >https://salsa.debian.org/holgerw/release-notes and should be merged into the >original release-notes repo first so we actually build them and not the old >docbook ones, but not 100% sure about this point because I couldn't follow all >the related threads with all the attention they needed (apologies!). > > >Kind regards, > >El 4/10/23 a las 12:23, Holger Wansing escribió: >> Hi, >> >> Thomas Lange <la...@cs.uni-koeln.de> wrote (Wed, 4 Oct 2023 10:29:35 +0200): >>> Hi Holger, >>> >>> I really like the idea no to produce release notes for each >>> architecture but only one. Moving to sphinx is also nice. >>> >>> Sorry, if I broke your MR, by adding code that checks if something >>> changed in the git repo. I think I can easily add this to your code >>> later. So maybe we copy your version of 7release-notes and after that >>> I add my code. >> >> That would be really great! >> >>> Do you know how long the build process takes using sphinx? I've added >>> the code, because the build took around 90 minutes using docbook. >> >> I expect the build time to be reduced dramatically (rughly ~ 1/9, due to >> building only one arch instead of nine), but I have no definite values, >> expecially not for the run on www-master. >> >>> Any other things I should keep an eye on? >> >> None at the moment. >> >> Thanks for considering this MR. >> It would give us the possibility to move r-n to sphinx, which would be a >> great deal! >> >> >> Holger >> >> > -- Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3
