Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name> writes: > Hello, > > On Mon 16 Oct 2023 at 03:51am -07, Xiyue Deng wrote: > >> Looks like I got confused about what you suggested as there was a "0.3" >> tag that was from the upstream repo which I assume "git deborig" can use >> so I thought an "upstream" may help more. >> >> I've now also pushed an "upstream/0.3" tag at the commit that matches >> the "0.3" tag, but not sure whether this is what you were referring to. >> If this works better I can remove the upstream branch to avoid further >> complications. Please advice. Thanks! > > What I meant was simply pushing the 0.3 tag to salsa.
Ah got it, and done. Sorry for the confusion. I have also dropped the unnecessary tag "upstream/0.3" and the upstream branch, which is not actually used much in the dgit-maint-merge workflow AIUI. -- Xiyue Deng
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature