El 17/10/23 a las 16:49, Holger Levsen escribió:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 09:28:04AM -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> > El 17/10/23 a las 09:18, Holger Levsen escribió:
> > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 11:49:27PM -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> > > > As discussed in #debian-lts, unarchiving & reopening since this bug is
> > > > present in bullseye and bookworm: "golang*" installed packages are not
> > > > reported.
> > > I really would have prefered a new bug, instead of unarchiving this one.
> > Why? It is the same bug. (Real question, I am happy to improve my
> > workflows)
> 
> because the bug is closed in unstable. if it's still fixed in older suite,
> we (in Debian, in general) don't keep the bugs open.

s/still/still to be/?

> 
> else you would need to re-open all other bugs too, which are not fixed in 
> older suites.

OK. My intention is/was to re-open bugs that I needed to fix. Along with
#986333, I need to close #986581 in bullseye and buster too (*). For
this update, may I stick with the unarchiving & reopening procedure, to
keep it consistent?

Or do you still want me to open a new bug for it?

> > > And pretty please, please fix this in bookworm first, and get it accepted 
> > > by
> > > SRMs, before pushing this into bullseye.
> > As discussed on #debian-lts, this is already fixed in bookworm.
> 
> I was merely refering to what you wrote above: "As discussed in #debian-lts,
> unarchiving & reopening since this bug is present in bullseye and bookworm" 
> :-D

Indeed, brain fail typo! 😬

I correct:
"As discussed in #debian-lts, unarchiving & reopening since this bug is
present in bullseye and buster"

Cheers!

 -- Santiago

* as documented in the #986333-related git commit
(bf9dc3b6b76f6aa5bee6591a20428744a214cb69). Thanks Sylvain for properly
documenting this!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to