On 14 November 2023 at 09:15, Graham Inggs wrote:
| Source: rmatrix
| Version: 1.6-2-1
| Severity: serious
| X-Debbugs-Cc: debia...@lists.debian.org
| 
| Hi Dirk
| 
| I'm opening this bug as a place for discussion and to track the
| affected packages.  It can be closed once rmatrix and its
| reverse-dependencies are ready to migrate.

Well that seems to be a) the wrong severity and b) the wrong package.

We need to address the packages needing a rebuild. Mine (r-cran-lme4,
r-cran-rcppeigen).  have been taken care of.

Dirk
 
| I've copied your email to the debian-r mailing list [1] below.
| 
| Regards
| Graham
| 
| 
| [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-r/2023/11/msg00033.html
| 
| 
| Package Matrix is having a new and energetic maintainer/contributor in Mikael
| Jagan who is tidying up a few loose corners (and inter alia sent me a patch
| to RcppEigen that resulted in a coordinated CRAN update of RcppEigen, lme4,
| and OpenMx).
| 
| Mikael also identified two sets of packages needed a rebuild in messages to
| the r-package-devel list (the more-or-less official place in the R Project to
| ask / discuss package changes, it is a decent to be on) following private
| mails between him and me. See
| 
| https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-package-devel/2023q4/010051.html
| https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-package-devel/2023q4/010054.html
| 
| The first concerns packages using a LinkingTo: Matrix and building against
| Matrix _headers_. The second concerns caching of S4 signatures (which bit us
| at work because of SeuratObject [not in Debian] and how I got onto this).
| 
| Most of these are not in Debian but I think we need binary rebuilds of
| 
|    irlba                because of headers
|    OpenMx               because of headers, a new upstream 2.21.10 is out too
|    TMB                  because of headers
|    MatrixModels         because of S4 caching
| 
| I would appreciate it if someone could tickle rebuilds. To me a quick
| informal touch of debian/changelog would do; if someone thinks this needs a
| formal transition go for it.
| 
| The R Core team and the CRAN maintainers are aware of the implicit problem
| with signalling the need for binary rebuilds. They are discussing this, but
| do not have an answer. Historically, CRAN has informally rebuilt its binaries
| for windows and macOS, but that of course does not help binary distributors
| such as us, other Linux distros, Conda, r2u, ... at all.

-- 
dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org

Reply via email to